Case Study on Selecting Optimal Design for Main Central Cone of LEO Satellite

Authors

  • Semih Türkoğlu Turkish Aerospace, Space Systems, Department of Structural Engineering
  • Özge Özdemir Istanbul TechnicalUniversity, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Department of Aeronautical Engineering

Keywords:

Satellite, Structure, Central Cone, buckling, modal analysis, Design

Abstract

Satellite structures must endure the stresses encountered during and after launch while providing support for additional equipment. The central cone plays a crucial role in achieving this objective, serving as one of the key structures of the satellite. The primary aim of this study is to assess and choose the most effective design for the central cone intended for Low Earth Orbit satellites. To fulfill this objective, six distinct central cone designs were created using Siemens NX, all subjected to identical boundary conditions. These designs encompass three different concepts which are grid, sandwich, and semi-monocoque utilizing both CFRP and aluminum materials. Each cone underwent a comprehensive evaluation, comparing factors such as weight, stiffness, buckling, and stress strength through analyses conducted with Simcenter 3D. In the second phase of the study, some design iterations were made to make the selected central cone more optimum for Low Earth Orbit satellites by performing same analyzes and applying same boundary conditions with previous phase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. P. Sarafin Spacecraft Mission Structures (SMS) From Concept to Launch Course Book (2022, September) Instar Engineering and Consulting Inc. Available: https://www.instarengineering.com/pdf/courses/SMS_course_book-Sep2022.pdf

J. J. Vijker, Shells of revolution: cylinders / cones, in Spacecraft Structures, Springer, pp. 143–149 (2008),

A. Calvi and P. Bastia, Mechanical architecture and loads definition for the design and testing of the Euclid spacecraft, Advances in Aircraft and Spacecraft Science, 3(2), pp. 225–242 (2016).

K. Fletcher, Ed., Sentinel-3: ESA’s Global Land and Ocean Mission for GMES Operational Services. Noordwijk: ESA Communications, (2012).

Morozov, E.V and Lopatin, A.V., Computer modelling and simulation of the mechanical response of composite lattice structures, presented at the 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Tasmania, Australia, (2017).

Arianespace., Ariane – 5 User’s Manual, Issue 5 – Revision 2. (2016). Accessed: February 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.arianespace.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Ariane5_Users-Manual_October2016.pdf

Space Engineering – Materials, ECSS-E-ST-32-08C Rev.1, 2014, [Online] Available: https://ecss.nl/standard/ecss-e-st-32-08c-rev-1-space-engineering-materials-15-october-2014/

Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization, MMPDS-14, (2019).

HexWeb CR III Corrosion Resistant Specification Aluminum Honeycomb, Hexcel, 2017, [Online], Available:https://www.hexcel.com/user_area/content_media/raw

HexWeb_CRIII_DataSheet.pdf

Space Engineering – Structural Materials Handbook – Part 1: Overview and material properties and applications, ECSS-E-HB-32-20_Part-1A, 2011, Available: https://ecss.nl/hbstms/ecss-e-hb-32-20-part-1a-structural-materials-handbook-part-1-overview-and-material-properties-and-applications-20-march-2011/

“Göktürk-Y,” TUSAS, https://www.tusas.com/urunler/uzay/modernizasyon-programlari/gokturk-y (accessed Feb. 18, 2023).

Space Engineering – Structural factors of safety for spaceflight hardware, ECSS-E-ST-32-10C Rev.2 Corrigendum 1, 2019, Available: https://ecss.nl/standard/ecss-e-st

-32-10c-rev-2-corr-1-structural-factors-of-safety-for-spaceflight-hardware-1-august-2019/

Downloads

Published

05-04-2024

How to Cite

[1]
S. Türkoğlu and Özge Özdemir, “Case Study on Selecting Optimal Design for Main Central Cone of LEO Satellite”, JAST, vol. 17, no. Special Issue, pp. 1–18, Apr. 2024.